Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 13:36:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 276F50A6323D6282AEA2D92E7A5CE5C174B981B1BBDA62A4C2713E2621D12174
Participant Details

Original Note:

論文中にはマスク着用有無について言及されていないとの理由だけで、論文の内容とは異なる主張を広める恐れがあるとは言えません。論文のみを判断基準とするのは論文偏重です。 また、同内容の返信があるためこのツイートにノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678724323337703424
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 276F50A6323D6282AEA2D92E7A5CE5C174B981B1BBDA62A4C2713E2621D12174
  • createdAtMillis - 1689082571861
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678724323337703424276F50A6323D6282AEA2D92E7A5CE5C174B981B1BBDA62A4C2713E2621D12174