Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 01:14:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD7AB0685E6A4C4121D9E09B07B12B5A57D0F6DA87680E4ED6BF9D857735CA66
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is clearly satirical. The author links to the institute's actual faculty photos just below in the thread. She's making a comment about their composition, not actually arguing this is a faculty photo. And the fact that she's advertising doesn't make this misleading.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678717138058526723
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD7AB0685E6A4C4121D9E09B07B12B5A57D0F6DA87680E4ED6BF9D857735CA66
  • createdAtMillis - 1689210866954
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678717138058526723DD7AB0685E6A4C4121D9E09B07B12B5A57D0F6DA87680E4ED6BF9D857735CA66