Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-14 11:17:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 644E9DA854092E9782B281D92D642E1940D39E1BE6C0670B03BC712FF9C70F7F
Participant Details

Original Note:

It was retracted "…due to noncompliance with our editorial policies around consent. The participants of the survey have not provided written informed consent to participate in scholarly research or to have their responses published in a peer reviewed article" https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678654931778289666
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 644E9DA854092E9782B281D92D642E1940D39E1BE6C0670B03BC712FF9C70F7F
  • createdAtMillis - 1689333456923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678654931778289666644E9DA854092E9782B281D92D642E1940D39E1BE6C0670B03BC712FF9C70F7F