Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 02:15:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE602529295A10025C927985793C5F75AD00C3A350EAA34FA79E0C2D46AB8C46
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper was removed from the preprint server before the peer review process could even start because it did not meet basic standards. According to the Lancet, “the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678559033014341639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE602529295A10025C927985793C5F75AD00C3A350EAA34FA79E0C2D46AB8C46
  • createdAtMillis - 1689041720087
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678559033014341639BE602529295A10025C927985793C5F75AD00C3A350EAA34FA79E0C2D46AB8C46