Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 00:28:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7EBCCB5D3BE86E8886F26A1C70A334A20A71B860E20474020F98EE3A4802A333
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper was removed from the preprint server before the peer review process could even start because it did not meet basic standards. According to the Lancet, “the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678559033014341639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7EBCCB5D3BE86E8886F26A1C70A334A20A71B860E20474020F98EE3A4802A333
  • createdAtMillis - 1689035325211
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16785590330143416397EBCCB5D3BE86E8886F26A1C70A334A20A71B860E20474020F98EE3A4802A333