Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 18:10:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3959D61A70AB9EF6D518DCCAAA02B811D2687FA7EA8C8941FFF61E73B76E075B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This paper was removed from the preprint server before the peer review process could even start because it did not meet basic standards. According to the Lancet, “the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678559033014341639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3959D61A70AB9EF6D518DCCAAA02B811D2687FA7EA8C8941FFF61E73B76E075B
  • createdAtMillis - 1689099027852
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16785590330143416393959D61A70AB9EF6D518DCCAAA02B811D2687FA7EA8C8941FFF61E73B76E075B