Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-11 02:31:47 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F66082A096582734778F36BC620BA4F02167F5AE30BC8B5D10DE05CFEA96679A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Assumindo que Arthur do Val tenha bloqueado Kim Paim antes, isso não muda o fato de que Kim Paim pode ter bloqueado Arthur do Val (como descrito no tweet). Notas não são necessárias em discussões de Twitter pois não dá pra gente saber quem está certo ou errado. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/pt/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678469328708968456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F66082A096582734778F36BC620BA4F02167F5AE30BC8B5D10DE05CFEA96679A
  • createdAtMillis - 1689042707032
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1678469328708968456F66082A096582734778F36BC620BA4F02167F5AE30BC8B5D10DE05CFEA96679A