Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 19:10:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0790DE113C55D135A99E531C55F819FFE7F251F707B06E09A132FAE86DDF8E64
Participant Details

Original Note:

Assumindo que Arthur do Val tenha bloqueado Kim Paim antes, isso não muda o fato de que Kim Paim pode ter bloqueado Arthur do Val (como descrito no tweet). Notas não são necessárias em discussões de Twitter pois não dá pra gente saber quem está certo ou errado. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/pt/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678469328708968456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0790DE113C55D135A99E531C55F819FFE7F251F707B06E09A132FAE86DDF8E64
  • createdAtMillis - 1689016255083
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16784693287089684560790DE113C55D135A99E531C55F819FFE7F251F707B06E09A132FAE86DDF8E64