Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 19:46:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03CC079EBA6F5C45465F02EB93321947CD38FC1A83DDA355187331DF73FF928E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Assumindo que Arthur do Val tenha bloqueado Kim Paim antes, isso não muda o fato de que Kim Paim pode ter bloqueado Arthur do Val (como descrito no tweet). Notas não são necessárias em discussões de Twitter pois não dá pra gente saber quem está certo ou errado. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/pt/contributing/examples.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678469328708968456
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03CC079EBA6F5C45465F02EB93321947CD38FC1A83DDA355187331DF73FF928E
  • createdAtMillis - 1689018395864
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167846932870896845603CC079EBA6F5C45465F02EB93321947CD38FC1A83DDA355187331DF73FF928E