Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 15:23:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DA12F197FB2690F8D21C27B3934A32387E1BF4EE9609E8B2B9954CCFCFF1B57
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case was not ruled upon as it dismissed due to the lack of legal standing by the appellant. The judges however did comment and reported they were divided on the issue of the case (LGB Alliance’s charity status). The case may be brought back by someone with legal standing. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mermaids-v-Charity-Commission-judgment-060723.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678352203180916736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DA12F197FB2690F8D21C27B3934A32387E1BF4EE9609E8B2B9954CCFCFF1B57
  • createdAtMillis - 1689002629736
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16783522031809167367DA12F197FB2690F8D21C27B3934A32387E1BF4EE9609E8B2B9954CCFCFF1B57