Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 15:00:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 11AFC53CCBC75223A33895F8BF2A6C20C05DDB7526164591198B5E2045ECEC04
Participant Details

Original Note:

The case was not ruled upon as it dismissed due to the lack of legal standing by the appellant. The judges however did comment and reported they were divided on the issue of the case (LGB Alliance’s charity status). The case may be brought back by someone with legal standing. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mermaids-v-Charity-Commission-judgment-060723.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678352203180916736
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 11AFC53CCBC75223A33895F8BF2A6C20C05DDB7526164591198B5E2045ECEC04
  • createdAtMillis - 1689001219007
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167835220318091673611AFC53CCBC75223A33895F8BF2A6C20C05DDB7526164591198B5E2045ECEC04