Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 22:54:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 63A3C2495174B13D426F283611B5D47CEDD064017697BDABFBE5159F06D09100
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading--the study in the tweet is stating that *despite how the program is designed* it is still acting as a tax haven/giveaway to higher income brackets. Proposed note does not refute the tweet--the tweet's study is saying the note's argument is wrong. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1678174717415419907
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 63A3C2495174B13D426F283611B5D47CEDD064017697BDABFBE5159F06D09100
  • createdAtMillis - 1688943260904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167817471741541990763A3C2495174B13D426F283611B5D47CEDD064017697BDABFBE5159F06D09100