Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 02:51:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DE36187596CFC24035D8AD7D7265D76FF5BEF2E4B7053EEC3D427D9E2DF8E5AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “review” spends more time critiquing the subject matter and claims made in the film than it does talking about the film itself. None the less, it is all opinion. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677838747277090816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DE36187596CFC24035D8AD7D7265D76FF5BEF2E4B7053EEC3D427D9E2DF8E5AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1688871084226
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677838747277090816DE36187596CFC24035D8AD7D7265D76FF5BEF2E4B7053EEC3D427D9E2DF8E5AF