Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 02:43:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1CF6D0E129F25712C45F6991DDE04BC801782035C5956EDC2E62792FFFD17F5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The “review” spends more time critiquing the subject matter and claims made in the film than it does talking about the film itself. None the less, it is all opinion. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677838747277090816
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1CF6D0E129F25712C45F6991DDE04BC801782035C5956EDC2E62792FFFD17F5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688870585361
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16778387472770908161CF6D0E129F25712C45F6991DDE04BC801782035C5956EDC2E62792FFFD17F5D