Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 23:10:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD8F32680BCE92BBBF812B9BFE39E5853F59572EA4594FEACBC2CAF646583F2D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article in question asks a different question than what SCOTUS ruled on. SCOTUS ruled on compelled speech of creative works by government and not LGBT discrimination. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf https://reason.com/volokh/2023/07/03/how-to-read-303-creative-v-elenis/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677788534411780097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD8F32680BCE92BBBF812B9BFE39E5853F59572EA4594FEACBC2CAF646583F2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688857802043
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677788534411780097BD8F32680BCE92BBBF812B9BFE39E5853F59572EA4594FEACBC2CAF646583F2D