Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 10:47:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preprint was removed/retracted because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology - per Lancet. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677741632626610176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1688899630599
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 167774163262661017645EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB