Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 03:49:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 01A4561016D59302AB91FC49C6144F92BD5AAAA9546487B5A7E448BF6D927880
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preprint was removed/retracted because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology - per Lancet. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677741632626610176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 01A4561016D59302AB91FC49C6144F92BD5AAAA9546487B5A7E448BF6D927880
  • createdAtMillis - 1688874594514
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167774163262661017601A4561016D59302AB91FC49C6144F92BD5AAAA9546487B5A7E448BF6D927880