Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 12:03:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39BD759FCA0DB1ECD9434CEC361DE768D6CDD3A9D5FA3104303FA96907C5A24E
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 It was available as a pre-print https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31125-5/fulltext The Lancet publishes only 5% of papers submitted to it https://www.journalguide.com/journals/the-lancet

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677689060868112384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39BD759FCA0DB1ECD9434CEC361DE768D6CDD3A9D5FA3104303FA96907C5A24E
  • createdAtMillis - 1688904182101
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167768906086811238439BD759FCA0DB1ECD9434CEC361DE768D6CDD3A9D5FA3104303FA96907C5A24E