Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 13:52:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C30C73D62F4F2B1E60ED6EEA86E94CDDBD81443C782F6FF66E7862BE961B6F4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Although couched as an affirmation, the statement is sufficiently hyperbolic, insulting and intemperate that few people would confuse it for an objective statement of facts and most readers will immediately understand it is merely the expression of a contemptuous opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677668839977263105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C30C73D62F4F2B1E60ED6EEA86E94CDDBD81443C782F6FF66E7862BE961B6F4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688824322136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677668839977263105C30C73D62F4F2B1E60ED6EEA86E94CDDBD81443C782F6FF66E7862BE961B6F4C