Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 19:25:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E42D7ECD9E1E35C763CE66B7FB39C6B36F90DB562372A1B718AD97D7B669EC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Although couched as an affirmation, the statement is sufficiently hyperbolic, insulting and intemperate that few people would confuse it for an objective statement of facts and most readers will immediately understand it is merely the expression of a contemptuous opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677668839977263105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E42D7ECD9E1E35C763CE66B7FB39C6B36F90DB562372A1B718AD97D7B669EC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1688844358507
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16776688399772631053E42D7ECD9E1E35C763CE66B7FB39C6B36F90DB562372A1B718AD97D7B669EC9