Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 17:15:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3702A89965BAD209A87FED24E3D3BECEC6C206D92ECCEB7F1B74E15B3A61E4F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Although couched as an affirmation, the statement is sufficiently hyperbolic, insulting and intemperate that few people would confuse it for an objective statement of facts and most readers will immediately understand it is merely the expression of a contemptuous opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677668839977263105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3702A89965BAD209A87FED24E3D3BECEC6C206D92ECCEB7F1B74E15B3A61E4F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1688836521179
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16776688399772631053702A89965BAD209A87FED24E3D3BECEC6C206D92ECCEB7F1B74E15B3A61E4F8