Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 17:21:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 008AEE5F91438342439A86B403D6AD6708DC7DF1A451D083D64A13E9BC587DC0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preprint was removed/retracted because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology - per Lancet. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677667699143352320
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 008AEE5F91438342439A86B403D6AD6708DC7DF1A451D083D64A13E9BC587DC0
  • createdAtMillis - 1688836899426
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1677667699143352320008AEE5F91438342439A86B403D6AD6708DC7DF1A451D083D64A13E9BC587DC0