Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 15:52:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7B185694946BEC3653FA937AA3E8940F4D4260F3CAA7F09A5FE57056327E804F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note non nécessaire(NNN). Le tweet résume fidèlement le contenu de l'article. La question de savoir si la contre-offensive est une réussite ou un échec est hautement subjective et spéculative à ce stade. Les opinions personnelles n'ont pas leur place dans les CN: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/fr/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677643260242673664
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7B185694946BEC3653FA937AA3E8940F4D4260F3CAA7F09A5FE57056327E804F
  • createdAtMillis - 1688831579957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16776432602426736647B185694946BEC3653FA937AA3E8940F4D4260F3CAA7F09A5FE57056327E804F