Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-13 21:59:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 869590D4D2826D52CE44E4385C5D6138CA8EC1D1C73F44BCDF232F9EE8D57F93
Participant Details

Original Note:

More context needed on: - what is "new," as Boris Johnson introduced the ULEZ initially, it isn't new inherently (as suggested) - why he believes the charges relate more to raising funds than environmental outcome - why he believes that the ULEZ which he introduced is unjustified

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677613636226015232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 869590D4D2826D52CE44E4385C5D6138CA8EC1D1C73F44BCDF232F9EE8D57F93
  • createdAtMillis - 1689285554825
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1677613636226015232869590D4D2826D52CE44E4385C5D6138CA8EC1D1C73F44BCDF232F9EE8D57F93