Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 09:46:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E67AB40ED3C948480C9C15F5C44298A73390CFC726B90795EE5AAC216196998
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note suggested is not needed; the academic "credentials" of the author are irrelevant to the tweet and the political leanings of the director are meaningless. The tweet is effectively opinion. Countervailing opinions and nuance are for replies, not CN. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677600073587253249
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E67AB40ED3C948480C9C15F5C44298A73390CFC726B90795EE5AAC216196998
  • createdAtMillis - 1705571194812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16776000735872532491E67AB40ED3C948480C9C15F5C44298A73390CFC726B90795EE5AAC216196998