Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 13:43:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Writing a solo dissent as a supreme court justice is not an accomplishment. Any justice may write or join a concurring or dissenting opinion. A solo dissent means none of the other justices agreed with the author's opinion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procedures_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677533980646596610
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B
  • createdAtMillis - 1688823833619
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677533980646596610BD5EF9C900C3E521FF7C18F86F9B023DA6958B3F2931E48499C0308F9028858B