Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 13:39:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F156D610ADC9F7C0B5FAAF9D9D778EC067827C7E426A0537BE4E10EC70F4172C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The justice department's application for a stay on the injunction does not mention censorship. Rather it states that the injunction is overbroad and would prevent it from working with social media companies on matters that impact national security. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/06/social-media-judge-order/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677441302462451712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F156D610ADC9F7C0B5FAAF9D9D778EC067827C7E426A0537BE4E10EC70F4172C
  • createdAtMillis - 1688823543941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1677441302462451712F156D610ADC9F7C0B5FAAF9D9D778EC067827C7E426A0537BE4E10EC70F4172C