Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 18:55:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EF14DECDA6744D719153C69D5B09F11509F7C67C0C5ECBA85E4E451A216D4D43
Participant Details

Original Note:

The justice department's application for a stay on the injunction does not mention censorship. Rather it states that the injunction is overbroad and would prevent it from working with social media companies on matters that impact national security. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/06/social-media-judge-order/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677441302462451712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EF14DECDA6744D719153C69D5B09F11509F7C67C0C5ECBA85E4E451A216D4D43
  • createdAtMillis - 1689015332813
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1677441302462451712EF14DECDA6744D719153C69D5B09F11509F7C67C0C5ECBA85E4E451A216D4D43