Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 18:48:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AB9C7C5B20AC54F6474CCBA31F71D693B2C2CAA75B0808AD3C9F726C3251B433
Participant Details

Original Note:

The justice department's application for a stay on the injunction does not mention censorship. Rather it states that the injunction is overbroad and would prevent it from working with social media companies on matters that impact national security. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/06/social-media-judge-order/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677441302462451712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AB9C7C5B20AC54F6474CCBA31F71D693B2C2CAA75B0808AD3C9F726C3251B433
  • createdAtMillis - 1689014883413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677441302462451712AB9C7C5B20AC54F6474CCBA31F71D693B2C2CAA75B0808AD3C9F726C3251B433