Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 22:50:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 917C525CFB0A91AED88267D87AABFB47CC1A78080C8E93EC43A66EDD71BCE3B7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The justice department's application for a stay on the injunction does not mention censorship. Rather it states that the injunction is overbroad and would prevent it from working with social media companies on matters that impact national security. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/06/social-media-judge-order/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677441302462451712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 917C525CFB0A91AED88267D87AABFB47CC1A78080C8E93EC43A66EDD71BCE3B7
  • createdAtMillis - 1688856655402
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677441302462451712917C525CFB0A91AED88267D87AABFB47CC1A78080C8E93EC43A66EDD71BCE3B7