Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-15 02:25:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98
Participant Details

Original Note:

The justice department's application for a stay on the injunction does not mention censorship. Rather it states that the injunction is overbroad and would prevent it from working with social media companies on matters that impact national security. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/06/social-media-judge-order/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677441302462451712
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98
  • createdAtMillis - 1689387902966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16774413024624517126BAC0E449CA743C02D6458F897E56C77E331F5D25F3118BBD2AF5DF8FF9CFF98