Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-24 08:35:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FD64BCFAE97E325A88049E3AF36881C6C1E5DE3EEEC8C547925933A26CEAD49
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The tweet expresses a statement of support, clearly an opinion. In addition, the note above states incorrect information. Despite being biased, the source still provides various examples of evidence to criticize them. It does not support the claim that no evidence exists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677408554163027974
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FD64BCFAE97E325A88049E3AF36881C6C1E5DE3EEEC8C547925933A26CEAD49
  • createdAtMillis - 1698136532377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16774085541630279740FD64BCFAE97E325A88049E3AF36881C6C1E5DE3EEEC8C547925933A26CEAD49