Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 14:35:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- tweet says judges did not rule *in favor* of either party. this is supported by the BBC article cited by proposed note (case was dismissed- no ruling was made). tweet does not being up legal costs, wins, or losses. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65340857.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677301804789297153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B
  • createdAtMillis - 1688740501184
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167730180478929715395AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B