Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 13:06:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FF18368309BD2AFE2EEB8339F05CE373B3C8AE9B8F8EFD4F22533B0F83884D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- tweet says judges did not rule *in favor* of either party. this is supported by the BBC article cited by proposed note (case was dismissed- no ruling was made). tweet does not being up legal costs, wins, or losses. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65340857.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677301804789297153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FF18368309BD2AFE2EEB8339F05CE373B3C8AE9B8F8EFD4F22533B0F83884D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1688735210760
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16773018047892971538FF18368309BD2AFE2EEB8339F05CE373B3C8AE9B8F8EFD4F22533B0F83884D0