Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-08 12:45:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DF5E62CCD36BCE3DFD12C90305B48211CCCD5F0543E28D9DA90C4789CB0474D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- tweet says judges did not rule *in favor* of either party. this is supported by the BBC article cited by proposed note (case was dismissed- no ruling was made). tweet does not being up legal costs, wins, or losses. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65340857.amp

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677301804789297153
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DF5E62CCD36BCE3DFD12C90305B48211CCCD5F0543E28D9DA90C4789CB0474D
  • createdAtMillis - 1688820319316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16773018047892971537DF5E62CCD36BCE3DFD12C90305B48211CCCD5F0543E28D9DA90C4789CB0474D