Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 15:15:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9334B2A31EF28EAF434FE89B712E7928BC417159AB9441C0C05909D171BB7CEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unless someone can come up with a reliable different number for the number of scanners in the UK (not just England btw!), no note is needed. The calculations and allegations made in the notes so far belong in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677262522154459137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9334B2A31EF28EAF434FE89B712E7928BC417159AB9441C0C05909D171BB7CEE
  • createdAtMillis - 1688742929667
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16772625221544591379334B2A31EF28EAF434FE89B712E7928BC417159AB9441C0C05909D171BB7CEE