Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 12:51:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 863EB6C8B7BCBCE56539276E985B28C252B1F8A99A56D9E38AF1D6D0C7B515E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unless someone can come up with a reliable different number for the number of scanners in the UK (not just England btw!), no note is needed. The calculations and allegations made in the notes so far belong in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677262522154459137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 863EB6C8B7BCBCE56539276E985B28C252B1F8A99A56D9E38AF1D6D0C7B515E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1688734293490
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677262522154459137863EB6C8B7BCBCE56539276E985B28C252B1F8A99A56D9E38AF1D6D0C7B515E0