Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 14:15:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3233A2C817F118E12D4E4AA35A273F9F1A485FD29CA6BCA1375E2D28AFAEFCB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Unless someone can come up with a reliable different number for the number of scanners in the UK (not just England btw!), no note is needed. The calculations and allegations made in the notes so far belong in the replies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677262522154459137
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3233A2C817F118E12D4E4AA35A273F9F1A485FD29CA6BCA1375E2D28AFAEFCB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1688739330473
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16772625221544591373233A2C817F118E12D4E4AA35A273F9F1A485FD29CA6BCA1375E2D28AFAEFCB1