Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 03:29:52 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80E9C5A88DBBB23E528CBF8E35253253D2FD3FD0F9A3314845B3C0157F0C8DD0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preprint was removed/retracted because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology - per Lancet. No Inclusion/exclusion criteria was provided for the study https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677143169199161344
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80E9C5A88DBBB23E528CBF8E35253253D2FD3FD0F9A3314845B3C0157F0C8DD0
  • createdAtMillis - 1688700592628
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167714316919916134480E9C5A88DBBB23E528CBF8E35253253D2FD3FD0F9A3314845B3C0157F0C8DD0