Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 02:36:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 19ECA94BA4B14677F2411C1BCFDDDB8546960FA8296DA7FD1B287AEE7E89DCB4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is factual. It states a censored paper was posted, and then removed. The fact that the Dr. seems to have an opinion about the study is irrelevant. No note is needed. https://t.co/EGei2jHV27

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677113370665975810
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 19ECA94BA4B14677F2411C1BCFDDDB8546960FA8296DA7FD1B287AEE7E89DCB4
  • createdAtMillis - 1688697397423
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167711337066597581019ECA94BA4B14677F2411C1BCFDDDB8546960FA8296DA7FD1B287AEE7E89DCB4