Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 23:18:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FF0243EDC26078A446E18A67881E423A7F14D558C59060F0E718037DAC176A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

There's nothing misleading about this, the tweet doesn't speak about the legality of surrogacy keep your opinions in the replies, NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677085840332455936
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FF0243EDC26078A446E18A67881E423A7F14D558C59060F0E718037DAC176A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1688685499927
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16770858403324559364FF0243EDC26078A446E18A67881E423A7F14D558C59060F0E718037DAC176A5