Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 13:39:51 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E693E965DE47FF9EA2CAF12BDC5E3D1E50C4C67575E66074A249DA640DC89D2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article cites five conspiracies, but is really a description of five controversies spun by the authors to make RFK appear incompetent. In science and history, nothing is definitive and skepticism healthy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_skepticism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677036800928276485
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E693E965DE47FF9EA2CAF12BDC5E3D1E50C4C67575E66074A249DA640DC89D2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1688737191653
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1677036800928276485E693E965DE47FF9EA2CAF12BDC5E3D1E50C4C67575E66074A249DA640DC89D2B