Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 15:49:13 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF8428AEDD00945CCA3C71E5F3DD53F6FED6FBB9E726D1F26903F3E89AFB03B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article cites five conspiracies, but is really a description of five controversies spun by the authors to make RFK appear incompetent. In science and history, nothing is definitive and skepticism healthy. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_skepticism

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677036800928276485
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF8428AEDD00945CCA3C71E5F3DD53F6FED6FBB9E726D1F26903F3E89AFB03B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1688744953974
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677036800928276485BF8428AEDD00945CCA3C71E5F3DD53F6FED6FBB9E726D1F26903F3E89AFB03B1