Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 19:23:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F58690BD3CCDE8DC7D9D7E9AA636B58C98A562B218C92146D8372FEAAF1709D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Tweet et l'article sont contraires aux dispositions de l'article 223-1-1 du code pénal (doxxing). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000043974282

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677031963562070017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F58690BD3CCDE8DC7D9D7E9AA636B58C98A562B218C92146D8372FEAAF1709D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1688671396751
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677031963562070017F58690BD3CCDE8DC7D9D7E9AA636B58C98A562B218C92146D8372FEAAF1709D1