Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 19:40:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7857E3C4DACAE7AD1F693B2997CF6C1A5E2555BB714DB57F80EB4DEE06FF05FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Tweet et l'article sont contraires aux dispositions de l'article 223-1-1 du code pénal (doxxing). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000043974282

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677031963562070017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7857E3C4DACAE7AD1F693B2997CF6C1A5E2555BB714DB57F80EB4DEE06FF05FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1688672406271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16770319635620700177857E3C4DACAE7AD1F693B2997CF6C1A5E2555BB714DB57F80EB4DEE06FF05FE