Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 19:44:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3807B6AC4D5F9AA1CFAD7913DA41BEDDE0EB946B05BC8D9FEFA3B6C728FFFB55
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Tweet et l'article sont contraires aux dispositions de l'article 223-1-1 du code pénal (doxxing). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000043974282

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677031963562070017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3807B6AC4D5F9AA1CFAD7913DA41BEDDE0EB946B05BC8D9FEFA3B6C728FFFB55
  • createdAtMillis - 1688672677014
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16770319635620700173807B6AC4D5F9AA1CFAD7913DA41BEDDE0EB946B05BC8D9FEFA3B6C728FFFB55