Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 19:13:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26754912B965614AEF178E3C727240B18E11230771DEFB5AE2D2BC492E61AF0B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le Tweet et l'article sont contraires aux dispositions de l'article 223-1-1 du code pénal (doxxing). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000043974282

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677031963562070017
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26754912B965614AEF178E3C727240B18E11230771DEFB5AE2D2BC492E61AF0B
  • createdAtMillis - 1688670797282
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167703196356207001726754912B965614AEF178E3C727240B18E11230771DEFB5AE2D2BC492E61AF0B