Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 14:39:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B1CB1F89D1E81632D4FDC6BA92128E495C177985E7EF4E0D3550B57B56A0E90
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's a fair shorthand to say that they won after being pursued through the courts and the court case being dismissed for being without standing. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mermaids-v-Charity-Commission-judgment-060723.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676961365242822658
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B1CB1F89D1E81632D4FDC6BA92128E495C177985E7EF4E0D3550B57B56A0E90
  • createdAtMillis - 1688740798296
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16769613652428226581B1CB1F89D1E81632D4FDC6BA92128E495C177985E7EF4E0D3550B57B56A0E90