Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 19:23:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9A04C1EC951B81B6E36E261CA70EA93678D21CAC5BFFC7862D2546C401DD697
Participant Details

Original Note:

From the Preprint site: "This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." Source: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676920499228557313
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9A04C1EC951B81B6E36E261CA70EA93678D21CAC5BFFC7862D2546C401DD697
  • createdAtMillis - 1688671412352
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1676920499228557313D9A04C1EC951B81B6E36E261CA70EA93678D21CAC5BFFC7862D2546C401DD697