Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-06 13:10:45 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D13E5DACBB703EBD7DDF549C05C7CFC03D69C46CA6F1632A70B1BBC2835E586A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet presents absolutely no evidence about its claim and this answer tries to disqualify the other tweet it answers to, by means of a fallacy: we don't need to be a doctor to tweet about a research. The RESEACHERS need to be qualified, not whoever tweets about it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1676913431142621184
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D13E5DACBB703EBD7DDF549C05C7CFC03D69C46CA6F1632A70B1BBC2835E586A
  • createdAtMillis - 1688649045324
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1676913431142621184D13E5DACBB703EBD7DDF549C05C7CFC03D69C46CA6F1632A70B1BBC2835E586A